Exynos 2400 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3

Heard about Samsung’s most anticipated Galaxy S24 series, launched recently, embedded with Exynos 2400 chipset, the South Korean-based giant processor. In most locations, Galaxy S24 and Galaxy S24+ models come with an inbuilt Exynos 2400 chipset, while on the other side, Galaxy S24 Ultra features the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. So which of these two chipsets is better in terms of specifications? 

Let’s make a detailed comparison of Exynos 2400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. Stay with us till the end of the blog to take away insights.

Comparison of Benchmark Score: Exynos 2400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3

Take A Comparative Glance For Specification

As we are looking for Exynos 2400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, we can start with specification measures to dive into technical details. Moving to the process aspects, Exynos 2400 uses Samsung's third-generation 4nm process (4LPP+/SF4P), while the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is made with a 4nm process (N4P), TSMC's second-generation.

Central Processing Unit (CPU) Performance 

Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 comes up with one Cortex-X4 CPU core clocked at 3.3GHz, and on the contrary, Exynos 2400 has a Cortex-X4 CPU clocked at  3.2GHz. Additionally, you will find three Cortex-A720 CPU cores clocked at 3.15GHz, along with two Cortex-A720 CPU cores clocked at 2.96GHz under Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. On the other hand, the Exynos 2400 is clocked at  2.6GHz and 2.9GHz. Definitely, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 gets an edge here.

Another core aspect of the CPU is Cortex-A520 power-efficient CPU cores; in Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, you will get two cores clocks at 2.27GHz. In comparison, the Exynos 2400 contains four cores clocked at 1.95GHz and has a preference over the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3.

Furthermore, in Exynos 2400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, both chipsets are compatible with UFS 4.0 storage and LPDDR 5X RAM. 

Graphical Processing Unit (GPU) Performance 

Moving towards the graphical and processing tasks, Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 encloses Adreno 750, one of the strongest GPUs across the smartphone segment. It even showed upgraded performance in comparison to Apple's A17 Pro chip. Conversely, Exynos 2400 uses Xclipse 940 GPU, which is embedded with RDNA3, AMD's greatest GPU technology.

Both Chipsets support hardware-based ray tracing and VRS (Variable Rate Shading) for games. However, for Exynos 2400 it needs to be assessed to whether it can deliver peak performance for a longer time or not. 

Further on, Exynos 2400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, both processors support  HDR, variable refresh rate, and HDR gaming. Although both can drive QHD+ screens at a 144Hz refresh rate, Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 drives at 4K 60Hz while Exynos 2400 can drive 4K 120Hz screens. That’s a significant difference to showcase distinct performance. 

AI Processing & NPUs (Neural Processing Units)

Both processors are evenly compatible with online AI processing with core NPUs. Interestingly, it does not require the Internet for processing; it can work offline, too. In these terms, for Exynos 2400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, both processors are too similar in display features, such as Generative AI-based text-to-image creation, language translation, image-to-text, and AI-based improvement suggestions while capturing videos and images using the phone's camera.

5G Speed Test

Finally, drawing a comparison for the 5G test on Exynos 2400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Exynos 2400 5G modem showed better speed. On the trial test by Beebom, the Exynos 2400 reached up to 386 Mbps in the download test, while the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offered the highest download speed at 338 Mbps. Next, for the uploading test, the Exynos 2400 reached up to 49.8 Mbps, while the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 reached 54 Mbps. 

Exynos 2400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3: Which Processor is Leading?

It is hard to strike a firm opinion on which is better; both processors are compatible for major performances and, at the same time, lag behind on a few technical terms. However, several tests showed that the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 works faster than Exynos 2400. Both chipsets are comparatively ideal choices for fast gaming and seamless performance. As the processing differences do not show a huge gap, you can go with any of them.

If you are a tech enthusiast who loves to explore more comparisons like Snapdragon 732G Vs Helio G95, follow TechtoReview!